Lore talk:Antiphyllos

Vampire bloodlines

This seems as good a spot to bring it up as any other. Most if not all of these High Rock and Hammerfell place articles have a vampire bloodline associated with them. In the case of Antiphyllos, it's Anthotis (or is it the Anthotis?). However, none that I recall seeing mentions or links to the vampire bloodlines pages. I'm just wondering if I should continue to ostracize these pages or start mentioning and linking. Minor Edits 03:41, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

This seems to be nothing more than either negligence or an outdated page (created before Lore namespace was linked efficiently). After all, there's really only been multiple users doing extensive work in Lore in the last six months or so -- not a very long time, and we are far from done. This problem should be taken care of ASAP along with all the other issues and inconsistencies (those that remain) in the Lore namespace (and the others, of course, but they aren't the topic here).--Kalis Agea^{Yes? Contrib E-mail} 04:32, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Okay, so every applicable page will get something like this incorporated into it: "In 3E 417, the [insert name here] vampire bloodline predominated the region." For the record, no cite is available, and I haven't played Daggerfall, so I'm forced to assume the bloodline lore pages are accurate. Minor Edits 07:10, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

I've played a the beginning of Daggerfall quite a bit, but don't know much about what Daggerfall has to say about vampires. However, based on the little I do know, the Lore bloodline pages are correct. As for integrating the info on years into the articles, I believe Legoless did something similar here, here, and here. That type of format should do the trick.--Kalis Agea^{Yes? Contrib E-mail} 00:17, 21 September 2011 (UTC)