UESPWiki:Deletion Review/Oblivion:Arborwatch
The UESPWiki – Your source for The Elder Scrolls since 1995
This is an archive of past UESPWiki:Deletion Review discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page, except for maintenance such as updating links. |
Oblivion:Arborwatch
Images on this page are all from a 3rd-party mod, and do not represent what the house actually looks like in the game. Alternatively, if somebody wants to replace all the images with versions from the un-modded game, that would work too. --TheRealLurlock Talk 09:26, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
- Question-Do the other houses in the game all have their own picture galleries/articles? If not, then I vote to delete. --Somercy 13:20, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
-
- Not really. It was because of the existence of this page that I decided to create Oblivion:Rosethorn Hall, which is only a bit more than a stub at the moment. None of the other houses have pages, though my opinion was that only the ones with names (these two and maybe Benirus Manor) would get them. Ideally, each page should give detailed descriptions of what exactly all of the upgrades do, though some of that is covered on Oblivion:Houses. At any rate, I don't necessarily think this page should be deleted, but those mod-images definitely should, and if possible they should be replaced by correct, un-modded images. (Unfortunately, there's no "Partial Deletion Review", so that's why I used this to bring up the issue.) --TheRealLurlock Talk 14:37, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
- I'd agree that these images should go but not the page. I'd eventually like to see full pages for all the buildings in the games, with images. But I imagine you've spotted that I'm image-fixated at the moment. I'd take new pictures of Arborwatch but my current character can't afford it yet. Rpeh 08:49, 2 June 2007 (EDT)
- Not really. It was because of the existence of this page that I decided to create Oblivion:Rosethorn Hall, which is only a bit more than a stub at the moment. None of the other houses have pages, though my opinion was that only the ones with names (these two and maybe Benirus Manor) would get them. Ideally, each page should give detailed descriptions of what exactly all of the upgrades do, though some of that is covered on Oblivion:Houses. At any rate, I don't necessarily think this page should be deleted, but those mod-images definitely should, and if possible they should be replaced by correct, un-modded images. (Unfortunately, there's no "Partial Deletion Review", so that's why I used this to bring up the issue.) --TheRealLurlock Talk 14:37, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
- I'll vote to keep it but remove the modded images, I'd also agree that all the houses should have pages and pictures,I've been trying to get a look at each house before I choose to buy so I just have to save and buy and upgrade each until I decide on my first. Darth Nyne 04:47, 7 June 2007 (EDT)
- Consensus: Nomination withdrawn - The mod-based images have been replaced, I'm withdrawing this nomination. --TheRealLurlock Talk 15:56, 7 September 2007 (EDT)